Monday, November 29, 2004

The Exclusive Church

There is so much talk these days about inclusiveness that it crossed my mind that it's about time we saved ourselves a lot of hassle and admitted that churches are exclusive institutions. They meet for a purpose - it may be expressed as 'to worship God' or it may be as simple as 'to get to know one another', but there's always a purpose behind a meeting. Anyone whose behaviour thwarts that purpose will be excluded. Try standing up and asking questions in the middle of a sermon in your average evangelical church! Try preaching at a social gathering (no, actually, I've seen it happen, so that one doesn't count....), but you get my drift - it's all about expected modes of behaviour. Conform and you'll be accepted, don't and you won't. In fact this applies to most gatherings, not just churches, but I just wonder if a lot of heartache, discussion, time and effort would be saved if churches were to accept that they are by definition exclusive institutions. I don't think it matters if you're post-modern, emergent or whatever, the disallowed behaviour is just different (the person who insists on answering all the questions for example).

1 Comments:

Blogger Mike Todd said...

That's true, Peter... I guess.

But I think what we're really talking about is a sliding scale of inclusivism. (Of course, thats risky because now we're talking about a subjective thing.) Most churches could move along the spectrum a little more towards the inclusive side and still maintain their purpose. (And in doing so maybe they'll be sliding towards actually living out the words of Christ.)

6:22 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home